Statement at the 10th Emergency Special Session on 17th of September 2024

Statement by Permanent Representative of Finland, Elina Kalkku on 17th of September 2024 at the Emergency Special Session.

Mr. President,

The General Assembly has come together to take action on a resolution that is fundamentally about international law. It follows the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice, the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the most authoritative interpreter of international law. Independent and impartial international courts are central to upholding the rule of law worldwide.

More specifically, the Advisory Opinion centers around one of the most fundamental rules underpinning the UN Charter; the prohibition of the acquisition of territory through the use of force. This prohibition is essential for international peace and security. Given our national history, it holds a special importance for Finland.

Another powerful promise of the UN Charter is the right to self-determination. The Palestinian people have had to wait for the realization of this right far too long. We as the international community must bear our responsibility in assisting the parties to end this conflict as soon as possible, and set up a credible process towards a negotiated two-state solution. Finland views the deadline set in this draft resolution as an incentive towards such a process.  If ever, now is the time.

Israel has the right to exist and live in peace and security within internationally recognized and secure borders. There is no justification for terrorism. Finland reiterates its strongest condemnation of the brutal attack committed by Hamas and other terrorist groups last October. We continue to call for a cease-fire and immediate release of the hostages remaining in Gaza. Again, we call on all parties to respect international humanitarian law.

The resolution at hand today, however, is not about the tragedy that has unfolded over the past 11 months. Nor is the resolution before us perfect. There is always room for improvement. With additional time for consultations, some concerns could have been further alleviated. However, the resolution, and the Advisory Opinion it seeks to give effect to, are about fundamental rules at the very heart of the UN Charter. This resolution is about respecting international law. It is about respecting the Advisory Opinion of the principal judicial body of the United Nations, the International Court of Justice.

For these reasons, Finland will vote in favor of this resolution.

I thank you.